Environmental Quality Incentives Program funding in Kansas

Kansas x 10.912 is an EQIP join, not an acreage census

This page pairs CFDA 10.912, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY INCENTIVES PROGRAM, with Kansas place of performance. The join is a USDA NRCS cost-share listing crossed with a state location field, not Kansas’s entire conservation budget and not a census of farms. SpendingVault sums tagged obligations: $185,600,857.13 on 4528 awards. The extract does not list acres, practice codes, or farm names. Treat the pair as a catalog intersection, not a ranking of which state has more need, and not a claim that 4528 awards equal 4,528 farms or 4,528 practices.

Other USDA listings — CRP, ACEP, or different NRCS titles — sit outside this total unless they also carry 10.912. Mixing those listings into $185,600,857.13 would invent a combined figure the packet never computed. Correlation between this obligation sum and cropland acres is not causation. Acreage figures are not in the packet. Place of performance as Kansas locates the tagged awards; it does not deposit $185,600,857.13 in the state treasury. Wichita-versus-western-Kansas folklore is not a county split in this packet. A high row count is still a record count, including modifications.

4,528 awards behind $185.6 million

Mean obligation is about $40,989.59 if $185,600,857.13 were divided evenly across 4528 lines. That ratio is not a published cost-share rate and not a cost per acre. Award count is a row count, including possible continuations and modifications. It is not a count of farms, practices, or counties.

Four thousand five hundred twenty-eight lines are too many to narrate one by one. Sort the Kansas 10.912 overlay by amount to see concentration. This page will not invent recipient names. Open Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Kansas for the stored table. Do not convert 4528 into a map of Kansas farms. The $185,600,857.13 total remains an obligation rollup on tagged awards. Inspect named lines rather than inferring an acreage census.

EQIP obligations are not practices already installed

EQIP awards often obligate as contracts are obligated and draw as practices are certified. The $185,600,857.13 headline is the obligation sum, not a punch-list of acres treated and not a Treasury outlay total. No fiscal year is attached. A NRCS EQIP signup table dated to a particular year is not automatically this join unless it uses CFDA 10.912, Kansas geography, and the obligation metric.

The listing title is Environmental Quality Incentives Program. This extract does not split livestock from cropland practices, and it does not split irrigation from nutrient management. Those cuts would require award documentation beyond dollars, 4528 awards, CFDA 10.912, and Kansas. This page will not invent a share. ACEP and CRP use different CFDA numbers even when the same landowner appears in folklore.

What the Kansas 10.912 table omits

The extract has no acres, practice codes, or farm names. Facts remain $185,600,857.13, 4528 awards, CFDA 10.912, and Kansas. This page will not invent a ranking against other states’ 10.912 joins. Idaho’s EQIP overlay on this slice is a separate pair with a different award count.

Kansas federal spending and Kansas programs place 10.912 among other listings. CFDA 10.912 is the national catalog line. All spending ties indexes other CFDA x state pairs. Mixing those shelves would invent a share of federal spending the packet never computed. The $185,600,857.13 figure is the tagged pair only. Campaign-finance filings are a different public-record system; this join does not claim donations funded these obligations.

Where the 10.912 x Kansas overlay lives

Start with Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Kansas for the 4528-award table behind $185,600,857.13. CFDA 10.912 is the nationwide listing. Kansas federal spending and Kansas programs give state context. All spending ties is the shelf for other program-by-state joins on the same obligation metric. 4,528 awards totaling $185,600,857.13 remain a high-volume contract file, not an acreage census. Practice names and per-acre prices are not in this packet. The $185,600,857.13 total is the tagged pair only. USAspending.gov remains the source; SpendingVault republishes the join. If a later extract revises the rollup, this page’s facts will be stale until the packet is rebuilt. Do not annualize $185,600,857.13: no fiscal year is in the facts.

How to read the Kansas × CFDA 10.912 pair

A ties page exists because two tables meet. One table is the assistance listing (CFDA 10.912). The other is place of performance as Kansas. The headline $185,600,857.13 is the obligation sum on that intersection. It is not a forecast, not a budget request, and not an outlay. It is also not a claim that CFDA 10.912 caused Kansas’s economy to grow. Correlation between geography and a catalog code is the join — nothing more. Use the internal links to step off this pair. If you need award-level names, open the overlay rather than treating this narrative as a recipient directory.

Questions

How much EQIP funding is obligated in Kansas?

USAspending.gov shows $185,600,857.13 in obligations for CFDA 10.912 with Kansas as place of performance, across 4528 awards. The sum is a commitment total on assistance awards, not outlays and not Kansas’s full conservation budget. Other listings are outside this join unless they also carry 10.912.

Do 4,528 awards mean 4,528 Kansas farms?

No. Award count is a row count of assistance awards and can include continuations and modifications. It is not a farm or acre census. The packet does not name producers. See the Kansas 10.912 overlay for named lines as USAspending stored them.

Does this include CRP in Kansas?

No. This page is CFDA 10.912, Environmental Quality Incentives Program. CRP and ACEP use different CFDA numbers. Those dollars are not inside $185,600,857.13 unless the award also carries 10.912. The extract has no acreage table.

Is $186 million already spent on Kansas conservation practices?

Not on this metric. Obligations are recorded commitments on assistance awards. Outlays are payments from the Treasury. The $185,600,857.13 headline is the obligation rollup in SpendingVault’s extract. Certified practices and remaining balances are not published in this packet.