General Services Administration in New Hampshire

HUD awards tagged to New Hampshire

Department of Housing and Urban Development as awarding agency, New Hampshire as place-of-performance: 2,600 records summing to $922,464,127.33. A Department of Housing and Urban Development award coded outside NH is out. An award in New Hampshire from a different awarding agency is out even if the topic sounds related. New Hampshire (NH) excludes Maine, Vermont, and Massachusetts. A Lawrence-coded award is Massachusetts even if the Merrimack story sounds similar.

Two thousand six hundred awards is a high-count HUD file. Recurring instruments can thicken a list without each row being a new housing units. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not read 2,600 as 2,600 unique housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. The overlay Department of Housing and Urban Development in New Hampshire is the both-keys table. New Hampshire federal spending is the all-agency state hub. Department of Housing and Urban Development is the agency book without an NH filter. All spending ties lists other joins.

Manchester, Nashua, and Concord share one NH stamp. PIH, CPD, and other HUD components can share awarding-agency 086 without a published bureau pie. Correlation is not causation: New Hampshire did not cause $922,464,127.33 by existing as a large or small place. Population and outcome scores are not packet facts. The join is 086 × NH only.

2,600 rows are not 2,600 units

$922,464,127.33 does not measure housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. Those series are not USAspending fields on this aggregate. The cell sums award obligations with awarding-agency code 086 and an NH place-of-performance tag.

Do not treat 2,600 awards as a census of housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. Parent hubs are supposed to be larger than this pair. If New Hampshire federal spending or Department of Housing and Urban Development matched $922,464,127.33 and 2,600, the join would be pointless. Use the overlay when both keys must stay on. Neighbor-state HUD joins are other pairs, not addends. Dividing $922,464,127.33 by 2,600 yields about $354,793.90 per award on average. That average hides contracts, grants, and other instruments. It is not a typical HUD line and not a published median.

Questions

How much has the Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated in New Hampshire?

USAspending.gov records $922,464,127.33 across 2,600 awards with awarding agency 086 and a New Hampshire tag. That is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a count of housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. Department of Housing and Urban Development in New Hampshire is the live overlay for this pair. Keep both keys when quoting $922,464,127.33.

Is $922,464,127.33 a measure of housing units?

No. The packet publishes $922,464,127.33 and 2,600 awards for agency 086 inside NH coding. Those other series are unpublished here. Unique recipients are unpublished. Quote the dollar total and the award count together. Obligations are not outlays. The implied mean is about $354,793.90, a ratio of two packet facts.

Is this a Manchester-only HUD total?

No. $922,464,127.33 and 2,600 awards are statewide New Hampshire place of performance. Manchester, Nashua, and Concord share one NH stamp. This packet does not publish a city split. A regional cut would be a different extract. Original filings remain on the source sites.

Where is the live HUD–New Hampshire table?

Department of Housing and Urban Development in New Hampshire is the overlay. New Hampshire federal spending and Department of Housing and Urban Development are the parents, not addends. All spending ties lists other pairs. Keep both sides of the join when citing $922,464,127.33. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays.