How much has the Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated in New Hampshire?

USAspending.gov records $922,464,127.33 across 2,600 awards with awarding agency 086 and a New Hampshire tag. That is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a count of housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. Department of Housing and Urban Development in New Hampshire is the live overlay for this pair. Keep both keys when quoting $922,464,127.33.

Is $922,464,127.33 a measure of housing units?

No. The packet publishes $922,464,127.33 and 2,600 awards for agency 086 inside NH coding. Those other series are unpublished here. Unique recipients are unpublished. Quote the dollar total and the award count together. Obligations are not outlays. The implied mean is about $354,793.90, a ratio of two packet facts.

Is this a Manchester-only HUD total?

No. $922,464,127.33 and 2,600 awards are statewide New Hampshire place of performance. Manchester, Nashua, and Concord share one NH stamp. This packet does not publish a city split. A regional cut would be a different extract. Original filings remain on the source sites.

Where is the live HUD–New Hampshire table?

Department of Housing and Urban Development in New Hampshire is the overlay. New Hampshire federal spending and Department of Housing and Urban Development are the parents, not addends. All spending ties lists other pairs. Keep both sides of the join when citing $922,464,127.33. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays.

← All data ties

Department of Housing and Urban Development federal obligations in New Hampshire

The Department of Housing and Urban Development shows $922,464,127.33 in USAspending.gov obligations coded to New Hampshire, across 2,600 awards. Awarding-agency 086 and New Hampshire (NH) are the pair. Two thousand six hundred awards is a high-count HUD file. Recurring instruments can thicken a list without each row being a new housing units. The implied mean is about $354,793.90 per award — a quotient of two packet facts, not a typical project. USAspending.gov is the source. Amounts are obligations, not outlays.

Key figures

HUD in New Hampshire: $922,464,127.33 across 2,600 USAspending awards.
Implied mean about $354,793.90 per record — a packet quotient, not a typical project.
Agency 086 × NH is not a measure of housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households.
Cite obligations from USAspending.gov, not outlays.
New Hampshire federal spending and Department of Housing and Urban Development are parents, not amounts to add into $922,464,127.33.

HUD awards tagged to New Hampshire

Department of Housing and Urban Development as awarding agency, New Hampshire as place-of-performance: 2,600 records summing to $922,464,127.33. A Department of Housing and Urban Development award coded outside NH is out. An award in New Hampshire from a different awarding agency is out even if the topic sounds related. New Hampshire (NH) excludes Maine, Vermont, and Massachusetts. A Lawrence-coded award is Massachusetts even if the Merrimack story sounds similar.

Two thousand six hundred awards is a high-count HUD file. Recurring instruments can thicken a list without each row being a new housing units. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not read 2,600 as 2,600 unique housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. The overlay Department of Housing and Urban Development in New Hampshire is the both-keys table. New Hampshire federal spending is the all-agency state hub. Department of Housing and Urban Development is the agency book without an NH filter. All spending ties lists other joins.

Manchester, Nashua, and Concord share one NH stamp. PIH, CPD, and other HUD components can share awarding-agency 086 without a published bureau pie. Correlation is not causation: New Hampshire did not cause $922,464,127.33 by existing as a large or small place. Population and outcome scores are not packet facts. The join is 086 × NH only.

2,600 rows are not 2,600 units

$922,464,127.33 does not measure housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. Those series are not USAspending fields on this aggregate. The cell sums award obligations with awarding-agency code 086 and an NH place-of-performance tag.

Do not treat 2,600 awards as a census of housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. Parent hubs are supposed to be larger than this pair. If New Hampshire federal spending or Department of Housing and Urban Development matched $922,464,127.33 and 2,600, the join would be pointless. Use the overlay when both keys must stay on. Neighbor-state HUD joins are other pairs, not addends. Dividing $922,464,127.33 by 2,600 yields about $354,793.90 per award on average. That average hides contracts, grants, and other instruments. It is not a typical HUD line and not a published median.

New Hampshire, not a Merrimack HUD rollup

Place of performance NH is a geography tag on the award, not a metro list and not a commuting zone. New Hampshire (NH) excludes Maine, Vermont, and Massachusetts. A Lawrence-coded award is Massachusetts even if the Merrimack story sounds similar. Recipient address can differ from that state tag.

Manchester, Nashua, and Concord share one NH stamp. This packet does not split $922,464,127.33 by city, county, or named facility. 2,600 awards stay statewide. A county table would be a different extract.

Recurring HUD rows, still obligations

Even a thick file records obligations, not necessarily outlays. $922,464,127.33 can include amounts that pay on a later schedule. Citing it as cash already sent in New Hampshire confuses two concepts. Deobligations and upward adjustments both move the total.

New Hampshire's own budget is a different ledger. Mixing it with the 2,600-award USAspending file leaves this series. No fiscal year is published in this packet, so this page does not invent one. Keep the obligation label on $922,464,127.33.

What this pair does not prove

A large HUD total in New Hampshire does not mean the agency caused New Hampshire's fiscal mix, and it does not connect these obligations to campaign contributions. Keep $922,464,127.33 labeled as agency 086 obligations with New Hampshire place of performance. Neighbor HUD cells among Maine, Vermont, and Massachusetts are separate joins. This page does not rank New Hampshire as a winner or loser.

Recipient names are unpublished in this packet. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to explain $922,464,127.33. Place-of-performance NH can differ from a vendor mailroom. A Lawrence-coded award is Massachusetts even if the Merrimack story sounds similar. A later ingest can restate $922,464,127.33 and 2,600 without changing the join definition: awarding agency 086 crossed with New Hampshire.

Citing HUD in New Hampshire

Cite USAspending.gov: Department of Housing and Urban Development (agency 086) obligated $922,464,127.33 on 2,600 awards coded to New Hampshire. Name both sides. Keep “obligations.” Do not relabel the total as housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households.

Prefer Department of Housing and Urban Development in New Hampshire if the overlay has refreshed after an ingest. New Hampshire federal spending still includes every other awarding agency tagged to NH. Department of Housing and Urban Development is the 086 parent without the NH filter. All spending ties indexes other pairs. Do not add those parents into $922,464,127.33.

A usable footnote names Department of Housing and Urban Development, New Hampshire, $922,464,127.33, and 2,600. The implied mean near $354,793.90 is $922,464,127.33 divided by 2,600. Means are not medians. USAspending.gov remains the originating system. FEC individual contributions are a different dataset; they do not fund this USAspending cell. Correlation is not causation.

Questions

How much has the Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated in New Hampshire?: USAspending.gov records $922,464,127.33 across 2,600 awards with awarding agency 086 and a New Hampshire tag. That is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a count of housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. Department of Housing and Urban Development in New Hampshire is the live overlay for this pair. Keep both keys when quoting $922,464,127.33.
Is $922,464,127.33 a measure of housing units?: No. The packet publishes $922,464,127.33 and 2,600 awards for agency 086 inside NH coding. Those other series are unpublished here. Unique recipients are unpublished. Quote the dollar total and the award count together. Obligations are not outlays. The implied mean is about $354,793.90, a ratio of two packet facts.
Is this a Manchester-only HUD total?: No. $922,464,127.33 and 2,600 awards are statewide New Hampshire place of performance. Manchester, Nashua, and Concord share one NH stamp. This packet does not publish a city split. A regional cut would be a different extract. Original filings remain on the source sites.
Where is the live HUD–New Hampshire table?: Department of Housing and Urban Development in New Hampshire is the overlay. New Hampshire federal spending and Department of Housing and Urban Development are the parents, not addends. All spending ties lists other pairs. Keep both sides of the join when citing $922,464,127.33. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays.

USAspending.gov aggregate of federal obligations by state and awarding agency. Obligations are not outlays.