Agricultural Conservation Easement Program in Utah

Utah x 10.931 is an ACEP join, not an acreage census

This page pairs CFDA 10.931, AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT PROGRAM, with Utah place of performance. The Agricultural Conservation Easement Program, in program language, is a USDA NRCS listing that funds agricultural land easements and wetland reserve easements. SpendingVault sums tagged obligations: $236,014,909 on twenty-two awards. The extract does not list acres eased, landowners, or easement type. Treat the pair as a catalog intersection, not a ranking of which state needs the program more, and not a claim that twenty-two awards equal that many local offices.

Other NRCS listings — EQIP, Conservation Stewardship, or different easement codes — sit outside $236,014,909 unless they also carry 10.931. Mixing ACEP with EQIP or Conservation Stewardship would invent a combined NRCS figure the packet never computed. Correlation between this obligation sum and local need statistics is not causation. Those statistics are not in the packet. Place of performance as Utah locates the tagged awards; it does not deposit $236,014,909 in the state treasury, and it does not prove every dollar stayed inside Utah after subawards.

22 awards behind $236,014,909

Award count is a row count of assistance awards, including possible annual runs and modifications. It is not a census of farms or a acres-eased inventory. Mean obligation is about $10.73 million if $236,014,909 were divided evenly across 22 lines — a mechanical ratio, not a typical payment published by the agency.

Twenty-two awards are too many to narrate one by one. Sort the Utah 10.931 overlay by amount to see concentration. This page will not invent recipient names. Open Agricultural Conservation Easement Program in Utah for the stored table. Do not convert 22 into a map of Utah providers. The $236,014,909 total remains an obligation rollup on tagged awards.

Questions

How much Agricultural Conservation Easement Program funding is obligated in Utah?

USAspending.gov shows $236,014,909 in obligations for CFDA 10.931 with Utah as place of performance, across twenty-two awards. The sum is a commitment total on assistance awards, not outlays and not the state's entire federal-spending total. Other USDA listings are outside this join unless they also carry 10.931.

Do 22 awards mean 22 Utah easements were recorded?

No. Award count is a row count of assistance awards and can include continuations. It is not a census of farms or a acres-eased inventory. The packet does not name recipients. See the Utah 10.931 overlay for named lines as USAspending stored them.

Does this include EQIP in Utah?

No. The join is CFDA 10.931 crossed with Utah place of performance. Related programs on other CFDA numbers are not inside $236,014,909 unless the award also carries 10.931. Mixing ACEP with EQIP or Conservation Stewardship would invent a combined NRCS figure the packet never computed.

Is the ACEP total already spent on Utah land purchases?

Not on this metric. Obligations are recorded commitments on assistance awards. Outlays are payments from the Treasury. The $236,014,909 headline is the obligation rollup in SpendingVault's extract. Completed activity and remaining balances are not published in this packet.