Agricultural Conservation Easement Program federal funding in Utah

Utah x 10.931 is an ACEP join, not an acreage census

This page pairs CFDA 10.931, AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT PROGRAM, with Utah place of performance. The Agricultural Conservation Easement Program, in program language, is a USDA NRCS listing that funds agricultural land easements and wetland reserve easements. SpendingVault sums tagged obligations: $236,014,909 on twenty-two awards. The extract does not list acres eased, landowners, or easement type. Treat the pair as a catalog intersection, not a ranking of which state needs the program more, and not a claim that twenty-two awards equal that many local offices.

Other NRCS listings — EQIP, Conservation Stewardship, or different easement codes — sit outside $236,014,909 unless they also carry 10.931. Mixing ACEP with EQIP or Conservation Stewardship would invent a combined NRCS figure the packet never computed. Correlation between this obligation sum and local need statistics is not causation. Those statistics are not in the packet. Place of performance as Utah locates the tagged awards; it does not deposit $236,014,909 in the state treasury, and it does not prove every dollar stayed inside Utah after subawards.

22 awards behind $236,014,909

Award count is a row count of assistance awards, including possible annual runs and modifications. It is not a census of farms or a acres-eased inventory. Mean obligation is about $10.73 million if $236,014,909 were divided evenly across 22 lines — a mechanical ratio, not a typical payment published by the agency.

Twenty-two awards are too many to narrate one by one. Sort the Utah 10.931 overlay by amount to see concentration. This page will not invent recipient names. Open Agricultural Conservation Easement Program in Utah for the stored table. Do not convert 22 into a map of Utah providers. The $236,014,909 total remains an obligation rollup on tagged awards.

ACEP obligations are not easements already recorded

Assistance awards often obligate to a state or recipient and draw as activities proceed. The $236,014,909 headline is the obligation sum, not a punch-list of easements already recorded and not a Treasury outlay total. No fiscal year is attached. An agency allocation table dated to a particular year is not automatically this join unless it uses CFDA 10.931, Utah geography, and the obligation metric.

The listing title is Agricultural Conservation Easement Program. This extract does not split agricultural land easements from wetland reserve easements. Those cuts would require award documentation beyond the packet facts. This page will not invent an activity-type share. ACEP awards can post as a modest number of large easement rows. Do not convert the award count into a map of counties or wetland acres. Place of performance locates the tagged awards; it does not prove every easement closed.

What the Utah ACEP table omits

The extract has no acres eased, landowners, or easement type. Facts remain $236,014,909, twenty-two awards, CFDA 10.931, and Utah. This page will not invent a ranking against other states' 10.931 joins. Place-of-performance as a state code locates tagged awards; it does not by itself explain recipient type.

Utah federal spending and Utah programs place 10.931 among other listings. CFDA 10.931 is the national catalog line. All spending ties indexes other CFDA x state pairs. Mixing those shelves would invent a share of USDA spending the packet never computed. The $236,014,909 figure is the tagged pair only.

Where the 10.931 x Utah overlay lives

Start with Agricultural Conservation Easement Program in Utah for the table behind $236,014,909. CFDA 10.931 is the nationwide listing. Utah federal spending and Utah programs give state context. All spending ties is the shelf for other program-by-state joins on the same obligation metric. Twenty-two awards totaling $236,014,909 remain easement-assistance rows, not an acreage census. Acres eased, landowners, or easement type are not in this packet. Outlays, remaining balances, and fiscal-year splits are omitted because they are not in the facts. Use the overlay for named award lines as USAspending stored them.

How to read 10.931 dollars in Utah without extra numbers

SpendingVault's extract for this join publishes two quantities: $236,014,909 in obligations and twenty-two awards. Everything else on this page is a description of what those two numbers are and are not. CFDA 10.931 is the catalog code; Utah is the place-of-performance state. The page does not add a fiscal year, a recipient roster, or a share of Utah spending, because those figures are not in the packet. If a dashboard elsewhere shows a different Ag Conservation Easement total, it may be using outlays, a different year, or a different geography. Those alternatives are not this join unless they use the same CFDA, the same state field, and the same obligation metric.

Internal links keep the join attached to its tables. Agricultural Conservation Easement Program in Utah is the overlay. CFDA 10.931 is the national program page. Utah federal spending and Utah programs place the listing in state context. All spending ties is the index of other program-by-state pairs. Following those links does not change $236,014,909. It shows where the same USAspending extract lives on the site.

Questions

How much Agricultural Conservation Easement Program funding is obligated in Utah?

USAspending.gov shows $236,014,909 in obligations for CFDA 10.931 with Utah as place of performance, across twenty-two awards. The sum is a commitment total on assistance awards, not outlays and not the state's entire federal-spending total. Other USDA listings are outside this join unless they also carry 10.931.

Do 22 awards mean 22 Utah easements were recorded?

No. Award count is a row count of assistance awards and can include continuations. It is not a census of farms or a acres-eased inventory. The packet does not name recipients. See the Utah 10.931 overlay for named lines as USAspending stored them.

Does this include EQIP in Utah?

No. The join is CFDA 10.931 crossed with Utah place of performance. Related programs on other CFDA numbers are not inside $236,014,909 unless the award also carries 10.931. Mixing ACEP with EQIP or Conservation Stewardship would invent a combined NRCS figure the packet never computed.

Is the ACEP total already spent on Utah land purchases?

Not on this metric. Obligations are recorded commitments on assistance awards. Outlays are payments from the Treasury. The $236,014,909 headline is the obligation rollup in SpendingVault's extract. Completed activity and remaining balances are not published in this packet.