Department of Commerce in Colorado 2nd District (CO-02)
USAspending.gov records $1,174,147,258.55 in Department of Commerce obligations with place of performance in Colorado 2nd District (CO-02). That awarding-agency 013 cell is 9.3% of the district's $12,688,286,519.69 published book. The join lists 578 award records. This page reports the pair, not a ranking of Colorado districts and not a roster of named labs.
Key figures
- USAspending records $1,174,147,258.55 in Commerce obligations in CO-02 (agency 013).
- That cell is 9.3% of the district's $12,688,286,519.69 published book.
- 578 award records are not a lab or vendor census.
- The total is commitments, not outlays. FEC donations do not fund this cell.
Commerce × CO-02 is not a lab directory
Agency 013 and Colorado 2nd District (CO-02) meet in one place-of-performance cell. $1,174,147,258.55 is the obligation sum tagged to that pair. It is not the district's full $12,688,286,519.69 book, not every Commerce dollar in Colorado, and not an outlay. The Colorado 2nd District hub still lists other awarding agencies; the Department of Commerce hub still lists other districts.
Front-Range speech often names NOAA, NIST, or research campuses as if they were the whole cell. This packet does not split $1,174,147,258.55 by bureau, name primes, or count labs. Assigning the total to a single campus invents a site the facts do not name. Correlation with local research news is not causation.
CO-02's district book beside agency 013
9.3% of $12,688,286,519.69 is tagged to Department of Commerce in this extract. Other awarding agencies fill the rest of Colorado 2nd District. Adding those rows into $1,174,147,258.55 would double-count. The Colorado 2nd District page at /districts/CO-02/ is the parent without an agency-013 filter.
Department of Commerce at /agencies/013/ drops the CO-02 filter. Colorado federal spending at /states/co/ drops the district cut. All spending ties at /ties/ indexes other pairs, including Interior in Colorado 7th District. Do not treat $1,174,147,258.55 as statewide Commerce obligations.
578 award records are not unique vendors
578 is the join award-record count, not unique vendors and not a lab roster. Dividing $1,174,147,258.55 by 578 is not a published typical award. Named recipients remain unpublished. Keep the row count on agency 013 × CO-02.
What Commerce in CO-02 omits
No outlays, no bureau split, no named primes, no FEC overlay. Campaign donations do not fund these USAspending obligations. Place of performance is a geography tag, not proof that a Commerce bureau headquarters sits in CO-02. Keep agency 013 and Colorado 2nd District on the same citation as $1,174,147,258.55.
Citing Commerce in Colorado 2nd District
Name Department of Commerce (agency 013), Colorado 2nd District (CO-02), $1,174,147,258.55 in obligations, and 578 award records on USAspending.gov. Quote /districts/CO-02/ for every awarding agency in CO-02 and /agencies/013/ for agency 013 without a district filter.
Reuse $1,174,147,258.55 only as Department of Commerce obligations with place of performance in CO-02. Filings remain on USAspending.gov. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset. Obligations of $1,174,147,258.55 are not outlays. Keep Department of Commerce (agency 013) and Colorado 2nd District (CO-02) together when citing $1,174,147,258.55. The 578 award-record count is the join field, not a unique-vendor census. Obligations of $1,174,147,258.55 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. Do not add the district parent of $12,688,286,519.69 into this agency-013 cell. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Place of performance in CO-02 is a geography tag, not a contractor roster. 9.3% is the published share of $12,688,286,519.69 tagged to Department of Commerce in this extract. Other awarding agencies on the Colorado 2nd District hub sit outside $1,174,147,258.55. Reuse the figure only as the 013 × CO-02 obligation join. Later USAspending ingests can restate $1,174,147,258.55. Cite the pair as commitments, not as checks already cleared in Colorado. The All spending ties index holds other keys. The join remains Department of Commerce (agency 013) with place of performance in Colorado 2nd District (CO-02). $1,174,147,258.55 is the obligation total; 578 is the award-record count; $12,688,286,519.69 is the district parent. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays. The join remains Department of Commerce (agency 013) with place of performance in Colorado 2nd District (CO-02). $1,174,147,258.55 is the obligation total; 578 is the award-record count; $12,688,286,519.69 is the district parent. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays.
Questions
- How much did Commerce obligate in Colorado 2nd District?
- USAspending.gov shows $1,174,147,258.55 in Department of Commerce obligations with place of performance in Colorado 2nd District (CO-02). The sum is a commitment total, not outlays and not the district's $12,688,286,519.69 book. Other agencies in CO-02 sit outside this join.
- Do 578 awards mean 578 Commerce labs in CO-02?
- No. 578 is the join award-record count, not labs or unique vendors. The packet names no contractors. Keep agency 013 and CO-02 in the citation. Colorado 7th District is a different geography. 578 is the join award-record count, not a unique-recipient census.
- Is this all federal spending in Colorado 2nd District?
- No. The join is awarding agency 013 crossed with CO-02 place of performance. The district parent is $12,688,286,519.69. Commerce's share is 9.3%. Other awarding agencies are separate cells on the district hub. Obligations of $1,174,147,258.55 are not outlays.
- Did FEC donations fund these Commerce awards?
- No. $1,174,147,258.55 is a USAspending obligation aggregate. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset and do not fund these awards. Outlays are unpublished. Cite agency 013 plus Colorado 2nd District (CO-02). USAspending.gov remains the source for agency 013 in CO-02.
USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to awarding agency. District 90/98 (multi/non-voting placeholders) are omitted. Obligations are not outlays.