Environmental Protection Agency in Texas 11th District (TX-11)
USAspending.gov records $1,121,810,090 in Environmental Protection Agency obligations with place of performance in Texas 11th District (TX-11). That awarding-agency 068 cell is 20.5% of the district's $5,485,598,918.83 published book. The join lists only 55 award records against an eleven-figure total. This page reports the pair, not a ranking of Texas districts and not a Superfund site list.
Key figures
- USAspending records $1,121,810,090 in EPA obligations in TX-11 (agency 068).
- That cell is 20.5% of the district's $5,485,598,918.83 book, on only 55 award records.
- 55 rows are not a Superfund or vendor census.
- The total is commitments, not outlays. FEC donations do not fund this cell.
EPA × TX-11 is a few-vehicle, large-dollar cell
Agency 068 and Texas 11th District (TX-11) meet in one place-of-performance cell. $1,121,810,090 is the obligation sum tagged to that pair. It is not the district's full $5,485,598,918.83 book, not every EPA dollar in Texas, and not an outlay. The Texas 11th District hub still lists other awarding agencies; the Environmental Protection Agency hub still lists other districts.
55 rows can still hold $1,121,810,090 when large assistance or contract vehicles dominate the file. That is not 55 named cleanup sites. A reader who assigns the cell to a single facility adds a label the facts do not carry. Correlation with local environmental news is not causation.
TX-11's district book beside agency 068
20.5% of $5,485,598,918.83 is tagged to Environmental Protection Agency in this extract—a sizable slice of the district book, still not the whole district. Other awarding agencies fill the remainder. Adding those rows into $1,121,810,090 would double-count. The Texas 11th District page at /districts/TX-11/ is the parent without an agency-068 filter.
Environmental Protection Agency at /agencies/068/ drops the TX-11 filter. Texas federal spending at /states/tx/ drops the district cut. All spending ties at /ties/ indexes other pairs. Do not treat $1,121,810,090 as statewide EPA obligations.
55 records are not a site roster
55 is the join award-record count, not unique vendors and not a Superfund inventory. Dividing $1,121,810,090 by 55 would invent a typical award size the packet never published. Named contractors remain unpublished. Keep the short row count on the join.
What EPA in TX-11 omits
No outlays, no program split, no named primes, no FEC overlay. Campaign donations do not fund these USAspending obligations. Place of performance is a geography tag, not proof that an EPA region office sits in TX-11. Keep agency 068 and Texas 11th District on the same citation as $1,121,810,090.
Citing EPA in Texas 11th District
Name Environmental Protection Agency (agency 068), Texas 11th District (TX-11), $1,121,810,090 in obligations, and 55 award records on USAspending.gov. Quote /districts/TX-11/ for every awarding agency in TX-11 and /agencies/068/ for agency 068 without a district filter.
Reuse $1,121,810,090 only as EPA obligations with place of performance in TX-11. Filings remain on USAspending.gov. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset. Obligations of $1,121,810,090 are not outlays. Keep Environmental Protection Agency (agency 068) and Texas 11th District (TX-11) together when citing $1,121,810,090. The 55 award-record count is the join field, not a unique-vendor census. Obligations of $1,121,810,090 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. Do not add the district parent of $5,485,598,918.83 into this agency-068 cell. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Place of performance in TX-11 is a geography tag, not a contractor roster. 20.5% is the published share of $5,485,598,918.83 tagged to Environmental Protection Agency in this extract. Other awarding agencies on the Texas 11th District hub sit outside $1,121,810,090. Reuse the figure only as the 068 × TX-11 obligation join. Later USAspending ingests can restate $1,121,810,090. Cite the pair as commitments, not as checks already cleared in Texas. The All spending ties index holds other keys. The join remains Environmental Protection Agency (agency 068) with place of performance in Texas 11th District (TX-11). $1,121,810,090 is the obligation total; 55 is the award-record count; $5,485,598,918.83 is the district parent. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays. The join remains Environmental Protection Agency (agency 068) with place of performance in Texas 11th District (TX-11). $1,121,810,090 is the obligation total; 55 is the award-record count; $5,485,598,918.83 is the district parent. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays.
Questions
- How much did EPA obligate in Texas 11th District?
- USAspending.gov shows $1,121,810,090 in Environmental Protection Agency obligations with place of performance in Texas 11th District (TX-11). The sum is a commitment total, not outlays and not the district's $5,485,598,918.83 book. Other agencies in TX-11 sit outside this join.
- Do 55 awards mean 55 Superfund sites in TX-11?
- No. 55 is the join award-record count against a large dollar total, not cleanup sites or unique vendors. The packet names no contractors. Keep agency 068 and TX-11 in the citation. Filings remain on USAspending.gov. 55 is the join award-record count, not a unique-recipient census.
- Is EPA most of Texas 11th District spending?
- Agency 068 is 20.5% of the district's $5,485,598,918.83 published book—a large slice, still not the whole district. Other awarding agencies remain on the Texas 11th District hub. Do not add those rows into $1,121,810,090.
- Did FEC donations fund these EPA awards?
- No. $1,121,810,090 is a USAspending obligation aggregate. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset and do not fund these awards. Outlays are unpublished. Cite agency 068 plus Texas 11th District (TX-11). USAspending.gov remains the source for agency 068 in TX-11.
USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to awarding agency. District 90/98 (multi/non-voting placeholders) are omitted. Obligations are not outlays.