Skip to main content
← All data ties

Opioid STR funding in California 6th District (CA-06)

USAspending.gov records $433,316,191 in Opioid Str (CFDA 93.788) obligations with place of performance in California 6th District (CA-06), across 2 awards. Two opioid-response rows against a $433,316,191 book is a state-agency vehicle tagged to CA-06, not two clinics. The pair is about 1.7% of the district’s $25,979,743,385.07 all-program obligation total in this extract. The dollars are obligations, not outlays.

Key figures

  • Opioid Str in California 6th District (CA-06): $433,316,191 across 2 awards.
  • About 1.7% of the district’s $25,979,743,385.07 all-program obligation total.
  • Average obligation per award is about $216,658,095.50 (ratio only).
  • The join is CFDA 93.788 × California 6th District (CA-06) place of performance, not an overdose ranking or a named-clinic roster.
  • Figures are USAspending obligations, not outlays.

CA-06 × 93.788 is an STR join, not an overdose ranking

Opioid Str meets California 6th District (CA-06) on this page. $433,316,191 is the obligation sum on awards that carry both the CFDA 93.788 tag and congressional-district place of performance CA-06. It is not California’s statewide Opioid STR book, not the nationwide program total, and not an overdose ranking or a named-clinic roster. California 6th District is the district parent without this program filter. CFDA 93.788 is the program parent without the CA-06 filter. Correlation is not causation.

2 is an award-action count. Modifications can add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished, and this page will not invent contractors or award recipients. Dividing $433,316,191 by 2 yields about $216,658,095.50 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical treatment slot or a typical county award. FEC contribution tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Opioid STR is a SAMHSA catalog line. Capital folklore is not a named-provider list, and this page will not invent contractors.

Opioid STR as a SAMHSA catalog title

The official catalog title is OPIOID STR. SpendingVault does not grade California 6th District (CA-06) on Opioid STR, backlog, or policy. $433,316,191 is an obligation sum, not a verdict. CFDA 93.788 without the district filter is the national hub; this packet has no national total, so none is quoted. Other SAMHSA block-grant or treatment listings remain outside $433,316,191.

SAMHSA STR/SOR program reports and state opioid-response dashboards are other series. They are not the 2 awards on USAspending.gov. Mixing a census from those files with this join would invent a per-unit dollar figure the packet does not support. STR/SOR pass-through and treatment-slot folklore is ordinary speech, not a packet field. IHP disaster assistance on 97.048 is a sibling CA-06 join in this slice. Mixing SAMHSA with FEMA would invent a combined district total.

California 6th District besides CFDA 93.788

California 6th District (CA-06) is the geography side. Place of performance CA-06 is a coding field in the award file. It does not prove residency of beneficiaries, students, patients, or vendors. California federal spending is the statewide parent and includes other districts. Sacramento speech is not a county treatment map. Neighboring CA-07 mental-health block-grant cells stay outside. A Opioid STR award tagged to CA-07 or CA-03 is not here.

The district’s all-program obligation total is $25,979,743,385.07. $433,316,191 is the Opioid Str slice of that book, about 1.7%. Remaining district dollars sit with other CFDAs on California 6th District, not inside this join. Quoting $433,316,191 as California 6th District (CA-06)’s entire federal book would drop every other catalog line.

Two awards behind the CA-06 STR total

2 awards against $433,316,191 implies about $216,658,095.50 per award. That mean is not a unit price and not a typical treatment slot or a typical county award. State opioid-response assistance awards can dominate dollars while the row count stays at 2. 2 rows can include continuations and amendments. Treat the count as records in an aggregate, not as 2 finished projects or 2 people. All spending ties lists other district-by-program pairs on the same obligation metric.

STR obligations versus treatment invoices already paid

An obligation is a recorded commitment. An outlay is a payment from the Treasury. $433,316,191 is the commitment figure. This packet has no outlay total and no fiscal-year split, so none is invented. Citing the figure as cash already spent in California 6th District (CA-06) over-reads the field. Do not rank California 6th District (CA-06) as a winner or loser versus other districts. Keep both sides in the citation: Opioid Str (CFDA 93.788) and California 6th District (CA-06).

Budget documents from Sacramento and California appropriations answer other questions. They are not the source of this cell. If a chart mixes General Fund activity with CFDA 93.788 in CA-06, the chart has left the federal award series. The capital-region fringe as speech, not a packet metro did not receive $433,316,191 as a named metro in this packet.

How to cite the 93.788 × CA-06 pair

Cite: Opioid Str (CFDA 93.788) obligated $433,316,191 on 2 awards coded to California 6th District (CA-06), per USAspending.gov. Keep both keys. Keep the word obligations. Open California 6th District for the district rollup, CFDA 93.788 for the program rollup, California federal spending for California statewide spending, and All spending ties for other pairs. Later bulk files can move the dollars and the 2-award count; prefer those tables when the live overlay and this snapshot diverge. None of those links convert this cell into an overdose ranking or a named-clinic roster, into outlays this packet omits, or into a contractor list.

Questions

How much Opioid Str funding is obligated in California 6th District (CA-06)?
USAspending.gov records $433,316,191 in CFDA 93.788 obligations with California 6th District (CA-06) place of performance across 2 awards. That is a program × district join, not an outlay and not California’s full federal total. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
Do 2 awards mean 2 local treatment-slot, provider,s?
No. 2 is an award-action count and can include modifications. Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $216,658,095.50 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical treatment slot or a typical county award.
Is this California 6th District (CA-06)’s entire federal spending total?
No. $433,316,191 is only the Opioid Str slice tagged to California 6th District (CA-06), about 1.7% of the district’s $25,979,743,385.07 all-program total. California federal spending is the statewide parent. Other CFDAs on California 6th District sit outside this join.
Where are the live CA-06 and CFDA 93.788 tables?
California 6th District is the district parent. CFDA 93.788 is the CFDA 93.788 hub. California federal spending is the California parent. All spending ties lists other pairs. Prefer those tables after later ingests; this page quotes 93.788 × CA-06 at $433,316,191.

USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to CFDA program. Obligations are not outlays.